


Moderator: Volunteer Moderator Team
Scottish nationalism surely.COLIN wrote:I.R.A unification of Ireland
Methinks you are correct.drh wrote:Scottish nationalism surely.COLIN wrote:I.R.A unification of Ireland
Could you perhaps show us some of those?ecce_lex wrote:the art used on the posters is identical to soviet war-time drawings and to today's DPRK propaganda. I've documented federal and cantonal voting matters for the past 4-5 years... if taken out of context you'd swear there's a war raging somewhere really close
Yes every one, I did...Everyone does National Service, and you keep your gun at home after you do it I understand.
I have some older ones that go back to the war years, the similarity is even more striking there.. I'll post a few tonight for a laugh.DCP23 wrote:ecce_lex, thanks for the posters, indeed very similar in style to Soviet 1930's - 1940's. Interesting.
The Falklands/Malvinas crisis was NOT about imperialism, it was NOT about Galtieri or Thatcher diverting attention from "local" political difficulties.Global Administrator wrote:ernelopez .. Argentina wants them back, and the British have 1000s of troops STILL sitting there as they too know that.![]()
They would not be there unless they expected a surprise visit again. Basic logic.
Nothing else in Argentina has expanded at that rate (or any rate!) .. Ushuaia's population has TREBLED in the past 20 years - agree? I colour not believe how huge it had grown in a mere 10 years between visits. Have you been there to see for yourself?
Given that one cannot walk down any street in Buenos Aires without spraining an ankle after stepping in holes in footpaths and craters and all kinds of other 4th world paving, it does seem odd that right opposite the Falklands your Government is spending a FORTUNE in that remote spot on Tierra Del Fuego.
I don't think the war (or the whole Falkland/Malvinas issue) was for oil at all.gavin-h wrote:The Falklands/Malvinas crisis was NOT about imperialism, it was NOT about Galtieri or Thatcher diverting attention from "local" political difficulties.Global Administrator wrote:ernelopez .. Argentina wants them back, and the British have 1000s of troops STILL sitting there as they too know that.![]()
They would not be there unless they expected a surprise visit again. Basic logic.
Nothing else in Argentina has expanded at that rate (or any rate!) .. Ushuaia's population has TREBLED in the past 20 years - agree? I colour not believe how huge it had grown in a mere 10 years between visits. Have you been there to see for yourself?
Given that one cannot walk down any street in Buenos Aires without spraining an ankle after stepping in holes in footpaths and craters and all kinds of other 4th world paving, it does seem odd that right opposite the Falklands your Government is spending a FORTUNE in that remote spot on Tierra Del Fuego.
I was a young under-graduate geologist at the time, and I clearly remember one of our lecturers coming into class during the invasion and saying "THIS IS ABOUT OIL!!!". The underlying rock formations are VERY likely to contain reserves on a massive scale.
Nobody in the general public in Argentina or Britain at the time really cared about these islands - and probably very few in either country knew where they were (there's a story that the BBC "globe" used on the TV between programmes had to be redrawn to include the islands...).
So why the war? And why nearly 30 years later have we got a huge British military presence, and a huge Angentinian infrastructure facing the islands?
It's to bring in the oil and/or to protect the interests of those drilling for it.
So far there have been a few low-key stories in the media about prospecting in that area, but the "big one" will come along soon:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/falkl ... onomy.html
And when it does, let's hope that all involved can co-operate peacefully and benefit from the prosperity that should result.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests