faro wrote: personally I'm reporting the items with the current highest bids - easier to get multiple reports that way if adopting such an approach consistently...
I think this is a sound strategy - always pick highest bidded items (cost inc P&P). There are 750 listed at present, and all have bids on. You may think eBay will realise there is a trend with this vendor, but evidence shows they have already killed 250 lots, without any footprint on the buyers records (so the buyer did not end them early, or similar).
IMPORTANT : Could I start with a request to
ONLY follow the instructions issued by the Global Administrator.
It is very important that any call to action is issued only from one place, and its not from me.
As my old school motto used to say "Unitate Fortior" (Together Stronger) - True of so many things in life.
However, I'm still like to write my experiences, so we can maybe have a debate on possible extra tools.
I've never had any luck following the "Report a Fake or Forgery" screen, even when I know ten other people have done the same. I suspect its because eBay put a specialist (probably a needlework specialist) on the case to review the facts, and decide "its probably o.k. anyway". Their experts cannot tell the difference between the "copy" impression being applied to a stamp or backing paper, so all I really think they check is "could eBay be liable"?
Similarly, with the other link you gave, which should be the simplest way to report multiple items, entry, today, from the UK, is somewhat problematical.
Even if you click the "read it out aloud for me" button, you get an error message. Very Frustrating. Another fault to report, and time is our biggest enemy, as we have to act quickly.
There is also the nuance that what this vendor is offering is not fake or forgery, its actually "nothing" (i.e. A good old financial fraud).
On eBay, they have another set of boxes for that
Now, those with an eye for detail will notice that its detected I've not bid on the item. They seem to take the report a lot more seriously if you do. ("Party to a conspiracy to defraud" just about covers it).
The point being that if you make minimum bid, you have an interest in the transaction, and if you report your suspicions, they supposedly look into it.
It may explain why this "experienced ebayer" (its not me) holds the minimum bid on so many lots.
(I wonder if the person retracting their bid realises how much they saved?)
You also notice on this screen there is a "tell us what you think" button, which if you click, you can put words like "just fraud tracking", or "investigating a fraud", which, as Global Admin notes, sows another seed in another department, whether they join those dots, or not.
There is a downside to minimum bidding. Its not that once you've reported a possible fraud, you are still liable - You will never get a strike for non payment on an item you reported, as at worst they'd ask you to pay the pound (whoopy do).
The big downside it that your bid seems to validate the vendor, and the bunnies (or maybe lemmings) follow even the slimmest form of leadership.
As an aside - What I can't explain in all this is how a collection of highly experienced eBay buyers could do this bidding pattern
How does somebody with 2,000 feedback (unless they are a ball bearing buyer, who is moonlighting) think that this stamp, which is probably one of the finest 240 mint examples in the world (of clear exhibition quality), is worth a bid of £11? It beggars belief.
One further thing I do, when I get my "New Search" mails come through on a daily basis (for items I have on my watch list), is edit them a bit and send them on to "
spoof@paypal.com", with a covering text of what I think the problem is.
Once the person has used the Paypal logo in their listing (its almost impossible not to nowadays), good old Paypal seems to take an interest, and probably have their own hotline to eBay. I'm not sure, I'm just speculating, but as before, like a wasp, the more people you irritate, the more likely they are to act.
Reporting to Paypal, like eBay, can feel like screaming into the void. Its frustrating, and not always successful. The "New Search" email can take a day to reach me, but Paypal reply with acknowledgement within about five minutes (usually).
You'll never know the individual outcome, or whether it was down to you, but we all want the same thing "Item or Vendor cannot be found".
So, in summary. I'll be following the Global Administrator's instructions first and foremost. Always on the top five by value first, working down the listing for others, as time permits. If I use any other tools, its in addition to, not instead of.
It may sound patronising from a newbie, but it comes from the heart that "a choir is more likely to be heard clearly, than a crowd".
Good work from Pertinax bringing it to our attention so quickly. I feel we got a good days start heads up, which is critical on fraudulent three day auctions.
Just my observations.