A theoretical note
A key post in this thread occurred at
https://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=85523&start=502
RogerE wrote: ↑19 Jul 2020 12:21
TWIN PRIMES!
114,659
114,661
Primes in the neighbourhood of N
This provided an incentive to look at the intervening number
N = 114,660 and the offsets
from this number to the neighbouring primes, listed in this thread. Nearby primes were seen
to cluster here, and be "almost" symmetrically located around N.
It turns out that N is composed of small primes:
N = 2x2x3x3x5x7x7x13, so if q is a composite number in the range 1< q < 11x11 = 121, it will share a prime factor with N, and then N – q and N + q will both be multiples of that shared prime factor. Therefore, if N – q or N + q is to be prime for offset 1 < q < 121,
then q is necessarily prime. (Then, even if N – q or N + q is not prime, its prime factors can only include primes 11 or p ≥ 17).
Here is a table showing what actually occurs for small offsets:
This accounts for all the primes in the immediate neighbourhood of N, and
the principle continues to "explain" which larger offsets q match prime N + q.
A glance to the future
Delete the factor 3x7 = 21 from N, and replace it by 2x11 = 22, to form the
modestly larger number
M = 2x2x2x3x5x7x11x13 = 120,120. The prime factors
of M are all primes below 17, so M – q or M + q will necessarily be composite
unless the offset q is 1 or has no prime factor less than 17. In particular, if
1 < q < 17^2 = 289 then M – q or M + q can only be prime of q is prime.
In due course we shall be examining numbers in the neighbourhood of 120,120
in this thread...
/RogerE
